Saturday, July 28, 2012

Tenormin Injection




Generic Name: atenolol

Dosage Form: Injection

Tenormin Description


Tenormin® (atenolol), a synthetic, beta1-selective (cardioselective) adrenoreceptor blocking agent, may be chemically described as benzeneacetamide, 4-[2'-hydroxy-3'-[(1-methylethyl)amino]propoxy]-. The molecular and structural formulas are:



C14H22N2O3


Atenolol (free base) has a molecular weight of 266. It is a relatively polar hydrophilic compound with a water solubility of 26.5 mg/mL at 37ºC and a log partition coefficient (octanol/water) of 0.23. It is freely soluble in 1N HCl (300 mg/mL at 25ºC) and less soluble in chloroform (3 mg/mL at 25°C).


Tenormin for parenteral administration is available as Tenormin I.V. Injection containing 5 mg atenolol in 10 mL sterile, isotonic, citrate-buffered, aqueous solution. The pH of the solution is 5.5-6.5.


Inactive Ingredients: Sodium chloride for isotonicity and citric acid and sodium hydroxide to adjust pH.



Tenormin - Clinical Pharmacology


Tenormin is a beta1-selective (cardioselective) beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent without membrane stabilizing or intrinsic sympathomimetic (partial agonist) activities. This preferential effect is not absolute, however, and at higher doses, Tenormin inhibits beta2-adrenoreceptors, chiefly located in the bronchial and vascular musculature.



Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism


In man, absorption of an oral dose is rapid and consistent but incomplete. Approximately 50% of an oral dose is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, the remainder being excreted unchanged in the feces. Peak blood levels are reached between two (2) and four (4) hours after ingestion. Unlike propranolol or metoprolol, but like nadolol, Tenormin undergoes little or no metabolism by the liver, and the absorbed portion is eliminated primarily by renal excretion. Over 85% of an intravenous dose is excreted in urine within 24 hours compared with approximately 50% for an oral dose. Tenormin also differs from propranolol in that only a small amount (6%-16%) of atenolol is bound to proteins in the plasma. This kinetic profile results in relatively consistent plasma drug levels with about a fourfold interpatient variation.


The elimination half-life of oral Tenormin is approximately 6 to 7 hours, and there is no alteration of the kinetic profile of the drug by chronic administration. Following intravenous administration, peak plasma levels are reached within 5 minutes. Declines from peak levels are rapid (5- to 10-fold) during the first 7 hours; thereafter, plasma levels decay with a half-life similar to that of orally administered drug. Following oral doses of 50 mg or 100 mg, both beta-blocking and antihypertensive effects persist for at least 24 hours. When renal function is impaired, elimination of Tenormin is closely related to the glomerular filtration rate; significant accumulation occurs when the creatinine clearance falls below 35 mL/min/1.73m2. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)



Pharmacodynamics


In standard animal or human pharmacological tests, beta-adrenoreceptor blocking activity of Tenormin has been demonstrated by: (1) reduction in resting and exercise heart rate and cardiac output, (2) reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at rest and on exercise, (3) inhibition of isoproterenol induced tachycardia, and (4) reduction in reflex orthostatic tachycardia.


A significant beta-blocking effect of Tenormin, as measured by reduction of exercise tachycardia, is apparent within one hour following oral administration of a single dose. This effect is maximal at about 2 to 4 hours, and persists for at least 24 hours. Maximum reduction in exercise tachycardia occurs within 5 minutes of an intravenous dose. For both orally and intravenously administered drug, the duration of action is dose related and also bears a linear relationship to the logarithm of plasma Tenormin concentration. The effect on exercise tachycardia of a single 10 mg intravenous dose is largely dissipated by 12 hours, whereas beta-blocking activity of single oral doses of 50 mg and 100 mg is still evident beyond 24 hours following administration. However, as has been shown for all beta-blocking agents, the antihypertensive effect does not appear to be related to plasma level.


In normal subjects, the beta1 selectivity of Tenormin has been shown by its reduced ability to reverse the beta2-mediated vasodilating effect of isoproterenol as compared to equivalent beta-blocking doses of propranolol. In asthmatic patients, a dose of Tenormin producing a greater effect on resting heart rate than propranolol resulted in much less increase in airway resistance. In a placebo controlled comparison of approximately equipotent oral doses of several beta blockers, Tenormin produced a significantly smaller decrease of FEV1 than nonselective beta blockers such as propranolol and, unlike those agents, did not inhibit bronchodilation in response to isoproterenol.


Consistent with its negative chronotropic effect due to beta blockade of the SA node, Tenormin increases sinus cycle length and sinus node recovery time. Conduction in the AV node is also prolonged. Tenormin is devoid of membrane stabilizing activity, and increasing the dose well beyond that producing beta blockade does not further depress myocardial contractility. Several studies have demonstrated a moderate (approximately 10%) increase in stroke volume at rest and during exercise.


In controlled clinical trials, Tenormin given as a single daily dose was an effective antihypertensive agent providing 24-hour reduction of blood pressure. Tenormin has been studied in combination with thiazide-type diuretics, and the blood pressure effects of the combination are approximately additive. Tenormin is also compatible with methyldopa, hydralazine, and prazosin, each combination resulting in a larger fall in blood pressure than with the single agents. The dose range of Tenormin is narrow and increasing the dose beyond 100 mg once daily is not associated with increased antihypertensive effect. The mechanisms of the antihypertensive effects of beta-blocking agents have not been established. Several possible mechanisms have been proposed and include: (1) competitive antagonism of catecholamines at peripheral (especially cardiac) adrenergic neuron sites, leading to decreased cardiac output, (2) a central effect leading to reduced sympathetic outflow to the periphery, and (3) suppression of renin activity. The results from long-term studies have not shown any diminution of the antihypertensive efficacy of Tenormin with prolonged use.


By blocking the positive chronotropic and inotropic effects of catecholamines and by decreasing blood pressure, atenolol generally reduces the oxygen requirements of the heart at any given level of effort, making it useful for many patients in the long-term management of angina pectoris. On the other hand, atenolol can increase oxygen requirements by increasing left ventricular fiber length and end diastolic pressure, particularly in patients with heart failure.


In a multicenter clinical trial (ISIS-1) conducted in 16,027 patients with suspected myocardial infarction, patients presenting within 12 hours (mean = 5 hours) after the onset of pain were randomized to either conventional therapy plus Tenormin (n = 8,037), or conventional therapy alone (n = 7,990). Patients with a heart rate of < 50 bpm or systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg, or with other contraindications to beta blockade, were excluded. Thirty-eight percent of each group were treated within 4 hours of onset of pain. The mean time from onset of pain to entry was 5.0 ± 2.7 hours in both groups. Patients in the Tenormin group were to receive Tenormin I.V. Injection 5-10 mg given over 5 minutes plus Tenormin Tablets 50 mg every 12 hours orally on the first study day (the first oral dose administered about 15 minutes after the IV dose) followed by either Tenormin Tablets 100 mg once daily or Tenormin Tablets 50 mg twice daily on days 2-7. The groups were similar in demographic and medical history characteristics and in electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial infarction, bundle branch block, and first degree atrioventricular block at entry.


During the treatment period (days 0-7), the vascular mortality rates were 3.89% in the Tenormin group (313 deaths) and 4.57% in the control group (365 deaths). This absolute difference in rates, 0.68%, is statistically significant at the P < 0.05 level. The absolute difference translates into a proportional reduction of 15% (3.89-4.57/4.57 = -0.15). The 95% confidence limits are 1%-27%. Most of the difference was attributed to mortality in days 0-1 (Tenormin - 121 deaths; control - 171 deaths).


Despite the large size of the ISIS-1 trial, it is not possible to identify clearly subgroups of patients most likely or least likely to benefit from early treatment with atenolol. Good clinical judgment suggests, however, that patients who are dependent on sympathetic stimulation for maintenance of adequate cardiac output and blood pressure are not good candidates for beta blockade. Indeed, the trial protocol reflected that judgment by excluding patients with blood pressure consistently below 100 mm Hg systolic. The overall results of the study are compatible with the possibility that patients with borderline blood pressure (less than 120 mm Hg systolic), especially if over 60 years of age, are less likely to benefit.


The mechanism through which atenolol improves survival in patients with definite or suspected acute myocardial infarction is unknown, as is the case for other beta blockers in the postinfarction setting. Atenolol, in addition to its effects on survival, has shown other clinical benefits including reduced frequency of ventricular premature beats, reduced chest pain, and reduced enzyme elevation.



Atenolol Geriatric Pharmacology:


In general, elderly patients present higher atenolol plasma levels with total clearance values about 50% lower than younger subjects. The half-life is markedly longer in the elderly compared to younger subjects. The reduction in atenolol clearance follows the general trend that the elimination of renally excreted drugs is decreased with increasing age.



Indications and Usage for Tenormin



Acute Myocardial Infarction


Tenormin is indicated in the management of hemodynamically stable patients with definite or suspected acute myocardial infarction to reduce cardiovascular mortality. Treatment can be initiated as soon as the patient's clinical condition allows. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, CONTRAINDICATIONS, and WARNINGS.) In general, there is no basis for treating patients like those who were excluded from the ISIS-1 trial (blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg systolic, heart rate less than 50 bpm) or have other reasons to avoid beta blockade. As noted above, some subgroups (eg, elderly patients with systolic blood pressure below 120 mm Hg) seemed less likely to benefit.



Contraindications


Tenormin is contraindicated in sinus bradycardia, heart block greater than first degree, cardiogenic shock, and overt cardiac failure. (See WARNINGS.)


Tenormin is contraindicated in those patients with a history of hypersensitivity to atenolol or any of the drug product’s components.



Warnings



Cardiac Failure


Sympathetic stimulation is necessary in supporting circulatory function in congestive heart failure, and beta blockade carries the potential hazard of further depressing myocardial contractility and precipitating more severe failure. In patients who have congestive heart failure controlled by digitalis and/or diuretics, Tenormin should be administered cautiously. Both digitalis and atenolol slow AV conduction.


In patients with acute myocardial infarction, cardiac failure which is not promptly and effectively controlled by 80 mg of intravenous furosemide or equivalent therapy is a contraindication to beta-blocker treatment.



In Patients Without a History of Cardiac Failure


Continued depression of the myocardium with beta-blocking agents over a period of time can, in some cases, lead to cardiac failure. At the first sign or symptom of impending cardiac failure, patients should be treated appropriately according to currently recommended guidelines, and the response observed closely. If cardiac failure continues despite adequate treatment, Tenormin I.V. should be withdrawn. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)



BOXED WARNING


Cessation of Therapy with Tenormin

Patients with coronary artery disease, who are being treated with Tenormin, should be advised against abrupt discontinuation of therapy. Severe exacerbation of angina and the occurrence of myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmias have been reported in angina patients following the abrupt discontinuation of therapy with beta blockers. The last two complications may occur with or without preceding exacerbation of the angina pectoris. As with other beta blockers, when discontinuation of Tenormin is planned, the patients should be carefully observed and advised to limit physical activity to a minimum. If the angina worsens or acute coronary insufficiency develops, it is recommended that Tenormin be promptly reinstituted, at least temporarily. Because coronary artery disease is common and may be unrecognized, it may be prudent not to discontinue Tenormin therapy abruptly even in patients treated only for hypertension. (SeeDOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)




Concomitant Use of Calcium Channel Blockers


Bradycardia and heart block can occur and the left ventricular end diastolic pressure can rise when beta-blockers are administered with verapamil or diltiazem. Patients with pre-existing conduction abnormalities or left ventricular dysfunction are particularly susceptible. (See PRECAUTIONS.)



Bronchospastic Diseases


PATIENTS WITH BRONCHOSPASTIC DISEASE SHOULD, IN GENERAL, NOT RECEIVE BETA BLOCKERS. Because of its relative beta1 selectivity, however, Tenormin may be used with caution in patients with bronchospastic disease who do not respond to, or cannot tolerate, other antihypertensive treatment. Since beta1 selectivity is not absolute, the lowest possible dose of Tenormin should be used with therapy initiated at 50 mg and a beta2-stimulating agent (bronchodilator) should be made available. If dosage must be increased, dividing the dose should be considered in order to achieve lower peak blood levels.



Anesthesia and Major Surgery


It is not advisable to withdraw beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs prior to surgery in the majority of patients. However, care should be taken when using anesthetic agents such as those which may depress the myocardium. Vagal dominance, if it occurs, may be corrected with atropine (1-2 mg IV).


Additionally, caution should be used when Tenormin I.V. Injection is administered concomitantly with such agents.


Tenormin, like other beta blockers, is a competitive inhibitor of beta-receptor agonists and its effects on the heart can be reversed by administration of such agents: eg, dobutamine or isoproterenol with caution (see section on OVERDOSAGE).



Diabetes and Hypoglycemia


Tenormin should be used with caution in diabetic patients if a beta-blocking agent is required. Beta blockers may mask tachycardia occurring with hypoglycemia, but other manifestations such as dizziness and sweating may not be significantly affected. At recommended doses Tenormin does not potentiate insulin-induced hypoglycemia and, unlike nonselective beta blockers, does not delay recovery of blood glucose to normal levels.



Thyrotoxicosis


Beta-adrenergic blockade may mask certain clinical signs (eg, tachycardia) of hyperthyroidism. Patients suspected of having thyroid disease should be monitored closely when administering Tenormin I.V. Injection. Abrupt withdrawal of beta blockade might precipitate a thyroid storm; therefore, patients suspected of developing thyrotoxicosis from whom Tenormin therapy is to be withdrawn should be monitored closely. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)



Untreated Pheochromocytoma


Tenormin I.V. should not be given to patients with untreated pheochromocytoma.



Pregnancy and Fetal Injury


Atenolol can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Atenolol crosses the placental barrier and appears in cord blood. Administration of atenolol, starting in the second trimester of pregnancy, has been associated with the birth of infants that are small for gestational age. No studies have been performed on the use of atenolol in the first trimester and the possibility of fetal injury cannot be excluded. If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus.


Neonates born to mothers who are receiving Tenormin at parturition or breast-feeding may be at risk for hypoglycemia and bradycardia. Caution should be exercised when Tenormin is administered during pregnancy or to a woman who is breast-feeding (See PRECAUTIONS, Nursing Mothers.)


Atenolol has been shown to produce a dose-related increase in embryo/fetal resorptions in rats at doses equal to or greater than 50 mg/kg/day or 25 or more times the maximum recommended human antihypertensive dose.1 Although similar effects were not seen in rabbits, the compound was not evaluated in rabbits at doses above 25 mg/kg/day or 12.5 times the maximum recommended human antihypertensive dose.1



1

Based on the maximum dose of 100 mg/day in a 50 kg patient.

Precautions

General


Patients already on a beta blocker must be evaluated carefully before Tenormin is administered. Initial and subsequent Tenormin dosages can be adjusted downward depending on clinical observations including pulse and blood pressure. Tenormin may aggravate peripheral arterial circulatory disorders.



Impaired Renal Function


The drug should be used with caution in patients with impaired renal function. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)



Drug Interactions


Catecholamine-depleting drugs (eg, reserpine) may have an additive effect when given with beta-blocking agents. Patients treated with Tenormin plus a catecholamine depletor should therefore be closely observed for evidence of hypotension and/or marked bradycardia which may produce vertigo, syncope or postural hypotension.


Calcium channel blockers may also have an additive effect when given with Tenormin (see WARNINGS).


Beta blockers may exacerbate the rebound hypertension which can follow the withdrawal of clonidine. If the two drugs are coadministered, the beta blocker should be withdrawn several days before the gradual withdrawal of clonidine. If replacing clonidine by beta-blocker therapy, the introduction of beta blockers should be delayed for several days after clonidine administration has stopped.


Concomitant use of prostaglandin synthase inhibiting drugs, eg, indomethacin, may decrease the hypotensive effects of beta blockers.


Caution should be exercised with Tenormin I.V. Injection when given in close proximity with drugs that may also have a depressant effect on myocardial contractility. On rare occasions, concomitant use of intravenous beta blockers and intravenous verapamil has resulted in serious adverse reactions, especially in patients with severe cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, or recent myocardial infarction.


Information on concurrent usage of atenolol and aspirin is limited. Data from several studies, ie, TIMI-II, ISIS-2, currently do not suggest any clinical interaction between aspirin and beta blockers in the acute myocardial infarction setting.


While taking beta blockers, patients with a history of anaphylactic reaction to a variety of allergens may have a more severe reaction on repeated challenge, either accidental, diagnostic or therapeutic. Such patients may be unresponsive to the usual doses of epinephrine used to treat the allergic reaction.



Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility


Two long-term (maximum dosing duration of 18 or 24 months) rat studies and one long-term (maximum dosing duration of 18 months) mouse study, each employing dose levels as high as 300 mg/kg/day or 150 times the maximum recommended human antihypertensive dose,1 did not indicate a carcinogenic potential of atenolol. A third (24 month) rat study, employing doses of 500 and 1,500 mg/kg/day (250 and 750 times the maximum recommended human antihypertensive dose1) resulted in increased incidences of benign adrenal medullary tumors in males and females, mammary fibroadenomas in females, and anterior pituitary adenomas and thyroid parafollicular cell carcinomas in males. No evidence of a mutagenic potential of atenolol was uncovered in the dominant lethal test (mouse), in vivo cytogenetics test (Chinese hamster) or Ames test (S typhimurium).


Fertility of male or female rats (evaluated at dose levels as high as 200 mg/kg/day or 100 times the maximum recommended human dose1) was unaffected by atenolol administration.



Animal Toxicology


Chronic studies employing oral atenolol performed in animals have revealed the occurrence of vacuolation of epithelial cells of Brunner's glands in the duodenum of both male and female dogs at all tested dose levels of atenolol (starting at 15 mg/kg/day or 7.5 times the maximum recommended human antihypertensive dose1) and increased incidence of atrial degeneration of hearts of male rats at 300 but not 150 mg atenolol/kg/day (150 and 75 times the maximum recommended human antihypertensive dose,1 respectively).



Usage in Pregnancy:



Pregnancy Category D


See WARNINGS- Pregnancy and Fetal Injury.



Nursing Mothers


Atenolol is excreted in human breast milk at a ratio of 1.5 to 6.8 when compared to the concentration in plasma. Caution should be exercised when Tenormin is administered to a nursing woman. Clinically significant bradycardia has been reported in breast fed infants. Premature infants, or infants with impaired renal function, may be more likely to develop adverse effects.


Neonates born to mothers who are receiving Tenormin at parturition or breast-feeding may be at risk for hypoglycemia and bradycardia. Caution should be exercised when Tenormin is administered during pregnancy or to a woman who is breast-feeding (See WARNINGS, Pregnancy and Fetal Injury.)



Pediatric Use


Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.



Geriatric Use:


Hypertension and Angina Pectoris Due to Coronary Atherosclerosis

Clinical studies of Tenormin did not include sufficient number of patients aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects. Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients. In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.


Acute Myocardial Infarction

Of the 8,037 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomized to Tenormin in the ISIS-1 trial (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY), 33% (2,644) were 65 years of age and older. It was not possible to identify significant differences in efficacy and safety between older and younger patients; however, elderly patients with systolic blood pressure < 120 mmHg seemed less likely to benefit (See INDICATIONS AND USAGE).


In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy. Evaluation of patients with hypertension or myocardial infarction should always include assessment of renal function.



Adverse Reactions


Most adverse effects have been mild and transient.


The frequency estimates in the following table were derived from controlled studies in hypertensive patients in which adverse reactions were either volunteered by the patient (US studies) or elicited, eg, by checklist (foreign studies). The reported frequency of elicited adverse effects was higher for both Tenormin and placebo-treated patients than when these reactions were volunteered. Where frequency of adverse effects of Tenormin and placebo is similar, causal relationship to Tenormin is uncertain.




















































































































Volunteered


(US Studies)



Total Volunteered


and Elicited


(Foreign + US Studies)



Atenolol


(n=164)


%



Placebo


(n=206)


%



Atenolol


(n=399)


%



Placebo


(n=407)


%



CARDIOVASCULAR



Bradycardia



3



0



3



0



Cold Extremities



0



0.5



12



5



Postural Hypotension



2



1



4



5



Leg Pain



0



0.5



3



1



CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM/


NEUROMUSCULAR



Dizziness



4



1



13



6



Vertigo



2



0.5



2



0.2



Light-headedness



1



0



3



0.7



Tiredness



0.6



0.5



26



13



Fatigue



3



1



6



5



Lethargy



1



0



3



0.7



Drowsiness



0.6



0



2



0.5



Depression



0.6



0.5



12



9



Dreaming



0



0



3



1



GASTROINTESTINAL



Diarrhea



2



0



3



2



Nausea



4



1



3



1



RESPIRATORY (see WARNINGS)



Wheeziness



0



0



3



3



Dyspnea



0.6



1



6



4



Acute Myocardial Infarction


In a series of investigations in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, bradycardia and hypotension occurred more commonly, as expected for any beta blocker, in atenolol-treated patients than in control patients. However, these usually responded to atropine and/or to withholding further dosage of atenolol. The incidence of heart failure was not increased by atenolol. Inotropic agents were infrequently used. The reported frequency of these and other events occurring during these investigations is given in the following table.


In a study of 477 patients, the following adverse events were reported during either intravenous and/or oral atenolol administration:





































































































Conventional


Therapy Plus


Atenolol


(n=244)



Conventional


Therapy


Alone


(n=233)



Bradycardia



43



(18%)



24



(10%)



Hypotension



60



(25%)



34



(15%)



Bronchospasm



3



(1.2%)



2



(0.9%)



Heart Failure



46



(19%)



56



(24%)



Heart Block



11



(4.5%)



10



(4.3%)



BBB + Major Axis Deviation



16



(6.6%)



28



(12%)



Supraventricular Tachycardia



28



(11.5%)



45



(19%)



Atrial Fibrillation



12



(5%)



29



(11%)



Atrial Flutter



4



(1.6%)



7



(3%)



Ventricular Tachycardia



39



(16%)



52



(22%)



Cardiac Reinfarction



0



(0%)



6



(2.6%)



Total Cardiac Arrests



4



(1.6%)



16



(6.9%)



Nonfatal Cardiac Arrests



4



(1.6%)



12



(5.1%)



Deaths



7



(2.9%)



16



(6.9%)



Cardiogenic Shock



1



(0.4%)



4



(1.7%)



Development of Ventricular


Septal Defect



0



(0%)



2



(0.9%)



Development of Mitral


Regurgitation



0



(0%)



2



(0.9%)



Renal Failure



1



(0.4%)



0



(0%)



Pulmonary Emboli



3



(1.2%)



0



(0%)


In the subsequent International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-1) including over 16,000 patients of whom 8,037 were randomized to receive Tenormin treatment, the dosage of intravenous and subsequent oral Tenormin was either discontinued or reduced for the following reasons:
















































*

Full dosage was 10 mg and some patients received less than 10 mg but more than 5 mg.


Reasons for Reduced Dosage



IV Atenolol Reduced


Dose (<5mg)*



Oral Partial


Dose



Hypotension/Bradycardia



105



(1.3%)



1168



(14.5%)



Cardiogenic Shock



4



(.04%)



35



(.44%)



Reinfarction



0



(0%)



5



(.06%)



Cardiac Arrest



5



(.06%)



28



(.34%)



Heart Block (>first degree)



5



(.06%)



143



(1.7%)



Cardiac Failure



1



(.01%)



233



(2.9%)



Arrhythmias



3



(.04%)



22



(.27%)



Bronchospasm



1



(.01%)



50



(.62%)


During postmarketing experience with Tenormin, the following have been reported in temporal relationship to the use of the drug: elevated liver enzymes and/or bilirubin, hallucinations, headache, impotence, Peyronie's disease, postural hypotension which may be associated with syncope, psoriasiform rash or exacerbation of psoriasis, psychoses, purpura, reversible alopecia, thrombocytopenia, visual disturbances, sick sinus syndrome, and dry mouth. Tenormin, like other beta blockers, has been associated with the development of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), lupus syndrome, and Raynaud’s phenomenon.



POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS


In addition, a variety of adverse effects have been reported with other beta-adrenergic blocking agents, and may be considered potential adverse effects of Tenormin.


Hematologic: Agranulocytosis.


Allergic: Fever, combined with aching and sore throat, laryngospasm, and respiratory distress.


Central Nervous System: Reversible mental depression progressing to catatonia; an acute reversible syndrome characterized by disorientation of time and place; short-term memory loss; emotional lability with slightly clouded sensorium; and, decreased performance on neuropsychometrics.


Gastrointestinal: Mesenteric arterial thrombosis, ischemic colitis.


Other: Erythematous rash.


Miscellaneous: There have been reports of skin rashes and/or dry eyes associated with the use of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. The reported incidence is small, and in most cases, the symptoms have cleared when treatment was withdrawn. Discontinuance of the drug should be considered if any such reaction is not otherwise explicable. Patients should be closely monitored following cessation of therapy. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)


The oculomucocutaneous syndrome associated with the beta blocker practolol has not been reported with Tenormin. Furthermore, a number of patients who had previously demonstrated established practolol reactions were transferred to Tenormin therapy with subsequent resolution or quiescence of the reaction.



Overdosage


Overdosage with Tenormin has been reported with patients surviving acute doses as high as 5 g. One death was reported in a man who may have taken as much as 10 g acutely.


The predominant symptoms reported following Tenormin overdose are lethargy, disorder of respiratory drive, wheezing, sinus pause and bradycardia. Additionally, common effects associated with overdosage of any beta-adrenergic blocking agent and which might also be expected in Tenormin overdose are congestive heart failure, hypotension, bronchospasm and/or hypoglycemia.


Treatment of overdose should be directed to the removal of any unabsorbed drug by induced emesis, gastric lavage, or administration of activated charcoal. Tenormin can be removed from the general circulation by hemodialysis. Other treatment modalities should be employed at the physician's discretion and may include:


BRADYCARDIA: Atropine intravenously. If there is no response to vagal blockade, give isoproterenol cautiously. In refractory cases, a transvenous card


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Tolbutamide


Class: Sulfonylureas
ATC Class: A10BB03
VA Class: HS502
CAS Number: 64-77-7

Introduction

Antidiabetic agent; sulfonylurea.187 b


Uses for Tolbutamide


Diabetes Mellitus


Monotherapy as an adjunct to diet and exercise for management of type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in patients whose hyperglycemia cannot be controlled with diet and exercise alone.187 b


Second-line therapy in combination with one or more other oral antidiabetic agents or insulin as an adjunct to diet and exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who do not achieve adequate glycemic control with diet, exercise, and oral antidiabetic agent monotherapy.135 145 146 147 148 149 167 168 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 188


Alternative therapy in some type 2 diabetic patients being treated with insulin or other antidiabetic agent(s).a b Useful in combination with insulin to improve glycemic control and/or decrease insulin dosage in some type 2 diabetic patients.135 145 146 150 151 153 154 155 156 157 158


Not effective as sole therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus101 103 106 or diabetic acidosis, ketosis, or coma; insulin is necessary.101 102 106 b (See Contraindications under Cautions.)


Not routinely recommended in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus.122 Long duration of action precludes rapid dosage adjustments.122 187 Increased risk of hypoglycemia in hospitalized diabetic patients with irregular eating patterns.122


Tolbutamide Dosage and Administration


General



  • Adjust dosage according to severity of disease, tolerance, and blood glucose determinations.a b




  • Monitor regularly (e.g., blood glucose concentrations) to determine minimum effective dosage and detect primary or secondary failure.a b (See Loss of Glycemic Control under Cautions.)




  • Monitor glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) to determine patient’s continued response to therapy.a




  • During transfer from insulin therapy, patients should test their blood glucose concentrations ≥3 times daily.b In some patients (e.g., those requiring >40 units of insulin daily), consider hospitalization during transition period.a b



Administration


Oral Administration


Administer orally in divided doses after meals to avoid GI intolerance; alternatively, may administer as a single daily dose in the morning.a b


Dosage


Adults


Diabetes Mellitus

Initiation

Oral

Initially, 1–2 g daily.a b


Initial Dosage in Patients Transferred from Other Oral Antidiabetic Agents

Oral

Initially, 1–2 g daily.a b May abruptly discontinue most other oral antidiabetic agents (except chlorpropamide).a b During transfer from chlorpropamide (a drug with a long elimination half-life), monitor closely for hypoglycemia during initial 2 weeks of transition period.a


Initial Dosage in Patients Transferred from Insulin

Oral

Insulin requirements ≤20 units daily: Initially, 1–2 g daily.a b May abruptly discontinue insulin.a b


Insulin requirements 20–40 units daily: Initially, 1–2 g daily, reduce daily insulin dosage by 30–50%.a b Subsequently, adjust insulin dosage according to therapeutic response.a b


Insulin requirements >40 units daily: Initially, 1–2 g daily; reduce daily insulin dosage by 20%.a b Subsequently, adjust insulin dosage according to therapeutic response.a b


Titration and Maintenance Dosage

Oral

Titrate dosage according to patient’s response, using lowest possible effective dosage.a b Usual maintenance dosage is 250 mg–3 g daily.a b Patients not responding to 2 g daily are unlikely to respond to higher dosages.b


Rarely, temporary increases to >2 g daily may be necessary to maintain glycemic control.b


Prescribing Limits


Adults


Diabetes Mellitus

Oral

Maximum 3 g daily.a


Special Populations


Hepatic Impairment


Use conservative initial and maintenance dosages to avoid hypoglycemia.a b (See Hepatic Impairment under Cautions.)


Renal Impairment


Use conservative initial and maintenance dosages to avoid hypoglycemia.a b (See Renal Impairment under Cautions.)


Geriatric Patients


Use conservative initial and maintenance dosages to avoid hypoglycemia.a b (See Geriatric Use under Cautions.)


Debilitated or Malnourished Patients


Use conservative initial and maintenance dosages to avoid hypoglycemia.a b


Adrenal or Pituitary Insufficiency


Use conservative initial and maintenance dosages to avoid hypoglycemia.a


Cautions for Tolbutamide


Contraindications



  • Known hypersensitivity to tolbutamide or any ingredient in formulation.a




  • Diabetic ketoacidosis, with or without coma.a b




  • Monotherapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus.a b



Warnings/Precautions


Warnings


Cardiovascular Effects

Increased cardiovascular mortality reported.109 a However, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) considers benefits of intensive glycemic control with insulin or sulfonylureas to outweigh risks overall.112 128


General Precautions


Hypoglycemia

Possible severe hypoglycemia, especially in geriatric, debilitated, or malnourished patients and those with adrenal, pituitary, hepatic, or renal insufficiency.a b Increased risk of hypoglycemia with strenuous exercise, alcohol ingestion, insufficient caloric intake, or concurrent drug use (e.g., other antidiabetic agents, agents that enhance hypoglycemic effects).a b


Hypoglycemia may be difficult to recognize in geriatric patients and in those receiving β-adrenergic blocking agents.a b


Appropriate patient selection and careful dosing and instructions are important to avoid tolbutamide-induced hypoglycemia.a


Hypoglycemia may result in coma, seizures, or other neurologic impairment.a


If hypoglycemia occurs, immediately reevaluate patient and adjust insulin or tolbutamide dosage.b Monitor patient for 24–48 hours;a may require hospitalization and IV dextrose.a b


Loss of Glycemic Control

Possible loss of glycemic control during periods of stress (e.g., fever, trauma, infection, surgery).a b May require use of insulin and/or temporary discontinuance of tolbutamide.a b


Efficacy of therapy may decrease over time (secondary failure); evaluate patients at regular intervals.a b


Assess patients for adequate adjustment of dose and adherence to diet before attributing inadequate response to secondary failure of the drug.a


Manufacturer recommends discontinuance of tolbutamide if loss of satisfactory glycemic control develops.a ADA and other clinicians recommend addition of other oral antidiabetic agents or insulin.127 164 180 181 182 183 184 188 190 (See Diabetes Mellitus under Uses.)


Specific Populations


Pregnancy

Category C.a


Prolonged (4–10 days), severe hypoglycemia reported in some neonates born to women receiving a sulfonylurea at delivery; more frequent with long-acting sulfonylureas.a Discontinue drug ≥2 weeks before expected delivery date to minimize the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.a


Many experts recommend the use of insulin during pregnancy.a


Lactation

Distributed into milk.e Manufacturer recommends discontinuing nursing or the drug.a AAP classifies tolbutamide as compatible with breast-feeding.e


If drug is discontinued and diet alone is inadequate for glycemic control, consider insulin.a


Pediatric Use

Safety and efficacy not established.a


Geriatric Use

Increased risk of hypoglycemia; hypoglycemia may be difficult to recognize.a b (See Geriatric Patients under Dosage and Administration.)


Hepatic Impairment

Increased risk of hypoglycemia.a b (See Hepatic Impairment under Dosage and Administration.)


Evaluate liver function frequently during tolbutamide initiation.b


Use with caution if history of hepatic porphyria; may exacerbate condition.b


Renal Impairment

Increased risk of hypoglycemia.a b (See Renal Impairment under Dosage and Administration.)


Common Adverse Effects


Nausea,a b epigastric fullness, a b heartburn,a b pruritus,a b erythema,a b urticarial, morbilliform, or maculopapular eruptions.a b


Interactions for Tolbutamide


Metabolized mainly by CYP2C9; minor metabolism by CYP2C19.c


Protein-bound Drugs


Potential pharmacokinetic interaction (increased hypoglycemic effect because of displacement of tolbutamide from binding sites on proteins).187 (See Specific Drugs and Laboratory Tests under Interactions.)


Close observation recommended when initiating or discontinuing concomitant therapy with a highly protein-bound drug.187


Specific Drugs and Laboratory Tests











































































Drug or Test



Interaction



Comments



Alcohol



Disulfiram like reactions reportedb



Antifungals, oral azoles (i.e., fluconazole, miconazole)



Possible increased plasma concentrations of sulfonylureas and hypoglycemic effect168 169 187



Not known whether interaction occurs with IV, topical, or vaginal miconazole187



Anticoagulants, oral



Possible displacement of tolbutamide from plasma proteins and potentiation of hypoglycemic effectsa b



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy initiated or discontinued, respectively187



β-Adrenergic blocking agents



Possible potentiation of hypoglycemic effectsa


Signs of hypoglycemia (e.g., tachycardia) may be masked by β-adrenergic blocking agentsa b



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Calcium-channel blocking agents



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Chloramphenicol



Possible potentiation of hypoglycemic effects187



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectively187



Contraceptives, oral



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Corticosteroids



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Diuretics



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectively187



Estrogens



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Isoniazid



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



MAO inhibitors



Possible potentiation of hypoglycemic effects187



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectively187



Niacin



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



NSAIAs



Possible displacement of tolbutamide from plasma proteins and potentiation of hypoglycemic effectsa b



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy initiated or discontinued, respectively187



Phenothiazines



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Phenytoin



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Probenecid



Possible potentiation of hypoglycemic effectsa



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Salicylates



Possible displacement of tolbutamide from plasma proteins and potentiation of hypoglycemic effectsa b



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy initiated or discontinued, respectively187



Sulfonamides



Possible displacement of tolbutamide from plasma proteins and potentiation of hypoglycemic effectsa b



Observe closely for hypoglycemia or loss of glycemic control when concurrent therapy initiated or discontinued, respectively187



Sympathomimetic agents



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya



Test for radioactive iodine reuptake



Possible decrease in radioactive iodine reuptake; may interfere with test resultsb



Test for urinary albumin



May produce false-positive results for urine albumin using acidification-after-boiling testa b


No interference with sulfosalicylic acid testa



Thyroid agents



Potential for decreased hypoglycemic effect187



Observe closely for loss of glycemic control or hypoglycemia when concurrent therapy is initiated or discontinued, respectivelya


Tolbutamide Pharmacokinetics


Absorption


Bioavailability


Rapidly absorbed following oral administration.a b Peak plasma concentrations attained at ≤3–5 hours.a b d


Onset


Following single 3-g dose (as a solution) in diabetic patients, gradual onset of hypoglycemic action; maximal effect 5–8 hours.a b


Duration


In diabetic patients, the hypoglycemic action may persist for up to 24 hours.a b


Food


Food does not affect pharmacokinetics.a d


Special Populations


In geriatric individuals, increased peak serum drug concentrations relative to younger adults.d


Distribution


Extent


Distributed into extracellular fluids; small amounts also may be distributed into bile.b


Tolbutamide crosses the placenta when administered near term and is distributed into milk.e


Plasma Protein Binding


Approximately 95%.b


Elimination


Metabolism


Metabolized to inactive metabolitesa principally via CYP2C9; minor contribution via CYP2C19.c


Elimination Route


Excreted in urine (75–85%), predominantly as inactive metabolites, and in feces.a b


Half-life


4.5–7 hours (range: 4–25 hours).a b c d


Special Populations


Metabolism influenced by CYP2C9 polymorphism; genetic differences in drug metabolism affect drug response.c


Stability


Storage


Oral


Tablets

Tight, light-resistant containers at 20–25°C.a


ActionsActions



  • Stimulates secretion of postprandial endogenous insulin from beta cells of the pancreas.a b




  • Ineffective in absence of functioning beta cells.a b




  • During prolonged administration, extrapancreatic effects (e.g., enhanced peripheral sensitivity to insulin, reduction of basal hepatic glucose production) contribute to hypoglycemic action.a b



Advice to Patients



  • Importance of informing patients of potential risks and advantages of tolbutamide therapy and of alternative forms of treatment.a




  • Importance of regular testing of blood glucose concentrations and HbA1c.122 a




  • According to manufacturer, patients should test their urine for glucose and acetone ≥3 times daily during insulin withdrawal.a b Report abnormal results to clinician for appropriate adjustments in therapy.a b




  • Importance of hygiene and avoidance of infection.b




  • Advise patients about nature of diabetes mellitus, prevention and detection of complications, and importance of glycemic control.b




  • Risks of hypoglycemia.a Importance of patients and responsible family members understanding symptoms and treatment of hypoglycemic reactions and identifying conditions that predispose to development of such reactions.a




  • Importance of understanding primary and secondary failure to therapy.a




  • Importance of women informing clinicians if they are or plan to become pregnant or plan to breast-feed.a




  • Importance of informing clinicians of existing or contemplated concomitant therapy, including prescription and OTC drugs.a




  • Importance of informing patients of other important precautionary information.a (See Cautions.)



Preparations


Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.


* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name













Tolbutamide

Routes



Dosage Forms



Strengths



Brand Names



Manufacturer



Oral



Tablets



500 mg*



Tolbutamide Tablets (scored)



Mylan


Comparative Pricing


This pricing information is subject to change at the sole discretion of DS Pharmacy. This pricing information was updated 03/2011. Actual costs to patients will vary depending on the use of specific retail or mail-order locations and health insurance copays.


TOLBUTamide 500MG Tablets (MYLAN): 60/$33.99 or 180/$80.97



Disclaimer

This report on medications is for your information only, and is not considered individual patient advice. Because of the changing nature of drug information, please consult your physician or pharmacist about specific clinical use.


The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com represent that the information provided hereunder was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com make no representations or warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any implied warranty of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose, with respect to such information and specifically disclaims all such warranties. Users are advised that decisions regarding drug therapy are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and the information is provided for informational purposes only. The entire monograph for a drug should be reviewed for a thorough understanding of the drug's actions, uses and side effects. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com do not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information is not a substitute for medical care.

AHFS Drug Information. © Copyright, 1959-2011, Selected Revisions August 2008. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.




References


Only references cited for selected revisions after 1984 are available electronically.



101. The Upjohn Company. Micronase (glyburide) prescribing information. Kalamazoo, MI; 1988 May.



102. Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals Inc. Diaβeta (glyburide) prescribing information. Somerville, NJ; 1987 Dec.



103. Anon. Glibenclamide: a review. Drugs. 1971; 1:116-40. [PubMed 5004340]



104. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Koivisto V. New concepts in the pathogenesis and treatment of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1983; 74(Suppl 1A):52-81. [IDIS 164138] [PubMed 6337486]



105. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979; 28:1039-57. [PubMed 510803]



106. Koda-Kimble MA. Diabetes mellitus. In: Koda-Kimble MA, Young LY, eds. Applied therapeutics: the clinical use of drugs. 5th ed. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc.; 1992:72–1-53.



107. Scientific Advisory Panel of the Executive Committee, American Diabetes Association. Policy statement: the UGDP controversy. Diabetes. 1979; 28:168-70.



108. Jackson JE, Bressler R. Clinical pharmacology of sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents: part 2. Drugs. 1981; 22:295-320. [IDIS 143257] [PubMed 7030708]



109. Food and Drug Administration. Labeling for oral hypoglycemic drugs of the sulfonylurea class. [Docket No. 75N-0062] Fed Regist. 1984; 49:14303-31.



110. Skyler JS. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a clinical strategy. Diabetes Care. 1984; 7(Suppl 1):118-29. [PubMed 6376024]



111. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998; 352:837-53. [IDIS 413216] [PubMed 9742976]



112. American Diabetes Association. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22(Suppl 1):27-31. [IDIS 437591] [PubMed 10333899]



113. Matthews DR, Cull CA, Stratton RR et al. UKPDS 26: sulphonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over 6 years. Diabet Med. 1998; 15:297-303. [PubMed 9585394]



114. Genuth P. United Kingdom prospective diabetes study results are in. J Fam Pract. 1998; 47:(Suppl 5):S27.



115. Bretzel RG, Voit K, Schatz H et al. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): implications for the pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1998; 106:369-72. [PubMed 9831300]



116. Schmitt JK, Moore JR. Hypertension secondary to chlorpropamide with amelioration by changing to insulin. Am J Hypertens. 1993; 6:317-9. [PubMed 8507452]



117. Genuth S, Brownless MA, Kuller LH et al. Consensus development conference on insulin resistance: Novermber 5-6 1997. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21:310-4. [IDIS 400179] [PubMed 9540000]



118. Henry RR. Glucose control and insulin resistance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124:97-103. [IDIS 358776] [PubMed 8554221]



119. Lebovitz HE. Stepwise and combination drug therapy for the treatment of NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17:1542-4. [IDIS 340102] [PubMed 7882832]



120. Nathan DM. Some answers, more controversy, from UKDS. Lancet. 1998; 352:832-3. [IDIS 413214] [PubMed 9742972]



121. Reviewers’ comments (personal observations) on metformin.



122. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(Suppl 1):S4-42.



123. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:977-86. [IDIS 320201] [PubMed 8366922]



124. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE et al. Glycosylated hemoglobin predicts the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. JAMA. 1988; 260:2864-71. [PubMed 3184351]



125. American Diabetes Association. Implications of the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19:50-2S.



126. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995; 28:103-17. [PubMed 7587918]



127. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998; 352:854-65. [IDIS 413217] [PubMed 9742977]



128. American Diabetes Association. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) for type 2 diabetes: what you need to know about the results of a long-term study. Washington, DC; September 15, 1998. From American Diabetes Association web site.



129. Davis TM. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: the end of the beginning? Med J Aust. 1998; 169:511-2.



130. Watkins PJ. UKPDS: a message of hope and a need for change. Diabet Med. 1998; 15:895-6. [PubMed 9827842]



131. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V et al. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirements for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999; 281:2005-12. [IDIS 425712] [PubMed 10359389]



132. American Diabetes Association. Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2000; 105:671-80. [IDIS 443594] [PubMed 10699131]



133. American Diabetes Association. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(Suppl 1):S4-19.



134. American Diabetes Association. Office guide to diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18(Suppl 1):4.



135. Williams G. Management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1994; 343:95-100. [IDIS 324190] [PubMed 7903785]



136. Genuth S. Exogenous insulin administration and cardiovascular risk in non-insulin-dependent and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(1 Part 2):104-9.



137. DeFronzo RA. The triumvirate: beta-cell, muscle, liver. A collusion responsible for NIDDM. Diabetes. 1988; 37:667-87. [PubMed 3289989]



138. Polonsky KS, Sturis J, Bell GI. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus-a genetically programmed failure of the beta cell to compensate for insulin resistance. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:777-83. [PubMed 8592553]



139. Swislocki A. Insulin resistance and hypertension. Am J Med Sci. 1990; 300:104-15. [IDIS 272104] [PubMed 2206054]



140. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998; 317:703-13. [IDIS 412064] [PubMed 9732337]



141. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus: UKPDS 39. BMJ. 1998; 317:713-20. [IDIS 412065] [PubMed 9732338]



142. Haffner SM, Hanefeld M, Fischer S et al. Glibenclamide, but not acarbose, increase leptin concentrations parallel to changes in insulin in subjects with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 1430-4. [IDIS 393377] [PubMed 9283792]



143. Shi H, Moustaid-Moussa N, Wilkison WO et al. Role of the sulfonylurea receptor in regulating human adipocyte metabolism. FASEB J. 1999; 13:1833-8. [PubMed 10506587]



144. Cheskin LJ, Bartlett SJ, Zayas R et al. Prescription medications: a modifiable contributor to obesity. South Med J. 1999; 92:898-904. [IDIS 435069] [PubMed 10498166]



145. Chow CC, Sorensen JP, Tsang LWW et al. Comparison of insulin with or without continuation of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatment of secondary failure in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18:307-14. [IDIS 346283] [PubMed 7555472]



146. The pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19:1510-18. (IDIS 355480).



147. Expert Committee of the Canadian Diabetes Advisory Board. Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J. 1992; 147:697-712.



148. Raskin P. Combination therapy in NIDDM N Engl J Med. 1992; 327:1453-4. Editorial.



149. Pugh JA, Ramirez G, Wagner ML et al. Is combination sulfonylurea and insulin therapy useful in NIDDM patients? A metaanalysis. Diabetes Care. 1992; 15:953-9. [PubMed 1387073]



150. Landstedt-Hallin L, Bolinder J, Adamson U et al. Comparison of bedtime NPH or preprandial regular insulin combined with glibenclamide in secondary sulfonylurea failure. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18:1183-6. [IDIS 351422] [PubMed 7587856]



151. Trischitta V, Italia S, Mazzarino S et al. Comparison of combined therapies in treatment of secondary failure to glyburide. Diabetes Care. 1992; 15:539-42. [PubMed 1499473]



152. Krentz AJ, Ferner RE, Bailey CJ. Comparative tolerability profiles of oral antidiabetic agents. Drug Safety. 1994; 11:223-41. [PubMed 7848543]



153. Buse J. Combining insulin and oral agents. Am J Med. 2000; 108(Suppl 6A):23S-32S. [IDIS 446200] [PubMed 10764847]



154. Johnson JL, Wolf SL, Kabadi UM. Efficacy of insulin and sulfonylurea combination therapy in type II diabetes: a meta-analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156:259-64. [IDIS 363130] [PubMed 8572835]



155. Florence JA, Yeager BF. Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am Fam Physician. 1999; 59:2835-44. [IDIS 428714] [PubMed 10348076]



156. Yki-Jarvinen H, Dressler A, Ziemen M et al. Less nocturnal hypoglycemia and better post-dinner glucose control with bedtime insulin glargine compared with bedtime HPH insulin during insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:1130-6 (IDIS 451244)



157. Bastyr EJ, Johnson ME, Trautman ME et al. Insulin lispro in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after oral agent failure. Clin Ther. 1999; 21:1703-4. [IDIS 438022] [PubMed 10566566]



158. DeFronzo RA. Pharmacologic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131:281-303. [IDIS 430576] [PubMed 10454950]



159. Eli Lilly and Company. Humalog (insulin lispro, rDNA origin) injection prescribing information. Indianapolis, IN; 2000 May 1.



160. Lebovitz HE. Clinical utility of oral hypoglycemic agents in the management of patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1983; 75(Suppl. 5B):94-9.



161. Anon. Diabetes mellitus. NIH Cons Dev Conf Statement. 1986; 6:1-7.



162. Blake GH. Control of type II diabetes: reaping the rewards of exercise and weight loss. Postgrad Med. 1992; 92:129-32. [PubMed 1437899]



163. Kerr CP. Improving outcomes in diabetes: a review of the outpatient care of NIDDM patients. J Fam Pract. 1995; 40:63-75. [PubMed 7807040]



164. Zimmerman B, Espenshade J, Fujimoto W et al. The pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18:1510-18. [IDIS 355480] [PubMed 8722084]



165. Bailey C, Turner R. Metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:574-9. [IDIS 360526] [PubMed 8569826]



166. Turner R, Cull C, Holman R et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 17: a 9-year update of a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of improved metabolic control on complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124(1 Pt 2):136-45. [IDIS 358782] [PubMed 8554206]



167. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Company. Glucovance(glyburide and metformin hydrochloride) tablets prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2002 Oct.



168. Pfizer Inc. Glucotrol XL(glipizide) extended release tablets prescribing information. New York, NY; 2001 Apr.



169. Pfizer. Diflucan (fluconazole) tablets, for oral suspension, and injection prescribing information. New York, NY; 1998 Jun.



170. Wolffenbuttel BHR, Gomist R, Squatrito S et al. Addition of low-dose rosiglitazone to sulphonylurea therapy improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2000; 17:40-7. [PubMed 10691158]



171. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America. Actos (pioglitazone hydrochloride) tablets prescribing information. Lincolnshire, IL; 2002 July.



172. SmithKline Beecham. Avandia (rosiglitazone maleate) tablets prescribing information. Philadelphia, PA; 2002 May



173. Kipnes MS, Krosnick a, Rendell MS et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Med. 2001; 111:10-7. [IDIS 467740] [PubMed 11448655]



174. Chiasson J, Josse R, Hunt J et al. The efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:929-935.



175. Coniff RF, Shapiro JA, Seaton TB et al. Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial comparing acarbose (BAY g 5421) with placebo, tolbutamide, and tolbutamide-plus-acarbose in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1995; 98:443-51. [IDIS 348267] [PubMed 7733122]



176. Calle-Pascual AL, Garcia-Honduvilla J, Martin-Alvarez PJ et al. Comparison between acarbose, metformin, and insulin treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure to sulfonylurea treatment. Diabetes Metab. 1995; 21:256-60.



177. Klein W. Sulfonylurea-metformin-combination versus sulfonylurea-insulin-combination in secondary failures of sulfonylurea monotherapy. Diab Metab. 1991; 17(Suppl 1):235-40.



178. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Metaglip (glipizide and metformin hydrochloride) prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2002 Oct.



179. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2002; 287:2563-9. [IDIS 480500] [PubMed 12020338]



180. Hermann LS, Scherstén B, Bitzén PO et al. Therapeutic comparison of metformin and sulfonylurea, alone and in various combinations. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17:1100-9. [IDIS 337045] [PubMed 7821128]



181. Hermann L. Biguanides and sulfonylureas as combination therapy in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1990; 13:37-41. [PubMed 2209342]



182. Hermann LS, Melander A. Biguanides: basic aspects and clinical use. In: Alberti KGMM, DeFronzo RA, Keen H et al, eds. International textbook of diabetes mellitus. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1992; 773-95.



183. Moses R, Carter J, Slobodniuk R et al. Effect of repaglinide addition to metformin monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. it/Diabetes Careotf/. 1999; 22:119-24.



184. Fonseca V,, Rosenstock J, Patwardhan R et al. Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000; 283:1695-702. [IDIS 443392] [PubMed 10755495]



185. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Glucophage (metformin hydrochloride) tablets and Glucophage XR (metformin hydrochloride) extended-release tablets prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2001 Jun.



186. Bayer. Precose (acarbose) tablets prescribing information. West Haven, CT; 2003 Mar.



187. Mylan Pharmaceuticals. Tolbutamide tablets prescribing information. Morgantown, WV; 2001 May.



188. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29:1963-72. [PubMed 16873813]